* [PATCH][next] acpi: nfit.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
@ 2020-03-19 19:50 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-03-25 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2020-03-19 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams, Vishal Verma, Dave Jiang, Ira Weiny,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: linux-nvdimm, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h b/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
index 24241941181c..af09143ce403 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
@@ -144,32 +144,32 @@ struct nfit_spa {
unsigned long ars_state;
u32 clear_err_unit;
u32 max_ars;
- struct acpi_nfit_system_address spa[0];
+ struct acpi_nfit_system_address spa[];
};
struct nfit_dcr {
struct list_head list;
- struct acpi_nfit_control_region dcr[0];
+ struct acpi_nfit_control_region dcr[];
};
struct nfit_bdw {
struct list_head list;
- struct acpi_nfit_data_region bdw[0];
+ struct acpi_nfit_data_region bdw[];
};
struct nfit_idt {
struct list_head list;
- struct acpi_nfit_interleave idt[0];
+ struct acpi_nfit_interleave idt[];
};
struct nfit_flush {
struct list_head list;
- struct acpi_nfit_flush_address flush[0];
+ struct acpi_nfit_flush_address flush[];
};
struct nfit_memdev {
struct list_head list;
- struct acpi_nfit_memory_map memdev[0];
+ struct acpi_nfit_memory_map memdev[];
};
enum nfit_mem_flags {
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][next] acpi: nfit.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
2020-03-19 19:50 [PATCH][next] acpi: nfit.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2020-03-25 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-30 19:54 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-03-25 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva, Dan Williams
Cc: Vishal Verma, Dave Jiang, Ira Weiny, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Len Brown, linux-nvdimm, ACPI Devel Maling List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:15 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct foo {
> int stuff;
> struct boo array[];
> };
>
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
>
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
>
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
>
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Dan,
I'm assuming that you will take care of this one or please let me know
otherwise.
Cheers!
> ---
> drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h b/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
> index 24241941181c..af09143ce403 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h
> @@ -144,32 +144,32 @@ struct nfit_spa {
> unsigned long ars_state;
> u32 clear_err_unit;
> u32 max_ars;
> - struct acpi_nfit_system_address spa[0];
> + struct acpi_nfit_system_address spa[];
> };
>
> struct nfit_dcr {
> struct list_head list;
> - struct acpi_nfit_control_region dcr[0];
> + struct acpi_nfit_control_region dcr[];
> };
>
> struct nfit_bdw {
> struct list_head list;
> - struct acpi_nfit_data_region bdw[0];
> + struct acpi_nfit_data_region bdw[];
> };
>
> struct nfit_idt {
> struct list_head list;
> - struct acpi_nfit_interleave idt[0];
> + struct acpi_nfit_interleave idt[];
> };
>
> struct nfit_flush {
> struct list_head list;
> - struct acpi_nfit_flush_address flush[0];
> + struct acpi_nfit_flush_address flush[];
> };
>
> struct nfit_memdev {
> struct list_head list;
> - struct acpi_nfit_memory_map memdev[0];
> + struct acpi_nfit_memory_map memdev[];
> };
>
> enum nfit_mem_flags {
> --
> 2.23.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][next] acpi: nfit.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
2020-03-25 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2020-03-30 19:54 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2020-03-30 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva, Vishal Verma, Dave Jiang, Ira Weiny,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, linux-nvdimm,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:06 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:15 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
> >
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> > introduced in C99:
> >
> > struct foo {
> > int stuff;
> > struct boo array[];
> > };
> >
> > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> > in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> > will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> > inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> >
> > Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> > this change:
> >
> > "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> > may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> > zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> >
> > This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> >
> > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> > [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>
> Dan,
>
> I'm assuming that you will take care of this one or please let me know
> otherwise.
Yes, this one and the other 2 related libnvdimm fixups are in my queue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-30 19:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-19 19:50 [PATCH][next] acpi: nfit.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-03-25 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-30 19:54 ` Dan Williams
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).