linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>,
	Chris Browy <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/14] cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:37:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4ipGMsKegzWtd+W8wr4mG7X9DtVeQYvL24Eyu1fB3AN=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209002418.1976362-10-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:24 PM Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Add a straightforward IOCTL that provides a mechanism for userspace to
> query the supported memory device commands.
>
> Memory device commands are specified in 8.2.9 of the CXL 2.0
> specification. They are submitted through a mailbox mechanism specified
> in 8.2.8.4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> I did attempt to use the same struct for querying commands as well as
> sending commands (upcoming patch). The number of unused fields between
> the two made for a bad fit IMO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst |   9 +++
>  drivers/cxl/mem.c                    |  89 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h         | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 200 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst b/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> index 5f723c25382b..ec54674b3822 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> @@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ CXL Memory Device
>  .. kernel-doc:: drivers/cxl/mem.c
>     :internal:
>
> +CXL IOCTL Interface
> +-------------------
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h
> +   :doc: UAPI
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h
> +   :internal:
> +
>  External Interfaces
>  ===================
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index bb6ea58f6c7b..2c4aadcea0e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h>
>  #include "acpi.h"
>  #include "pci.h"
>  #include "cxl.h"
> @@ -73,6 +74,49 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(cxl_mem_idr);
>  /* protect cxl_mem_idr allocations */
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(cxl_memdev_lock);
>
> +/*
> + * This table defines the supported mailboxes commands for the driver. The id is
> + * ordinal and thus gaps in this table aren't allowed. This table is made up of
> + * a UAPI structure. Non-negative values in the table will be validated against
> + * the user's input. For example, if size_in is 0, and the user passed in 1, it
> + * is an error.
> + */
> +#define CXL_CMD(_id, _flags, sin, sout, _name, _enable, op)                    \
> +       {                                                                      \
> +               { .id = CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_##_id,                              \
> +                 .flags = CXL_MEM_COMMAND_FLAG_##_flags,                      \
> +                 .size_in = sin,                                              \
> +                 .size_out = sout,                                            \
> +                 .name = _name },                                             \
> +                       .enable = _enable, .opcode = op                        \
> +       }

Seems the ordinality requirement could be dropped if the definition was:

#define CXL_CMD(_id, _flags, sin, sout, _name, _enable, op)                    \
       [CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_##_id] = {
                             \
               { .id = CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_##_id,                              \
...

Then command 0 and 42 could be defined out of order in the table.
Especially if we need to config-disable or deprecate commands, I think
it would be useful if this table was tolerant to being sparse.

> +
> +/**
> + * struct cxl_mem_command - Driver representation of a memory device command
> + * @info: Command information as it exists for the UAPI
> + * @opcode: The actual bits used for the mailbox protocol
> + * @enable: Whether the command is enabled. The driver may support a large set
> + *         of commands that may not be enabled. The primary reason a command
> + *         would not be enabled is for commands that are specified as optional
> + *         and the hardware doesn't support the command.
> + *
> + * The cxl_mem_command is the driver's internal representation of commands that
> + * are supported by the driver. Some of these commands may not be supported by
> + * the hardware (!@enable). The driver will use @info to validate the fields
> + * passed in by the user then submit the @opcode to the hardware.
> + *
> + * See struct cxl_command_info.
> + */
> +struct cxl_mem_command {
> +       const struct cxl_command_info info;
> +       const u16 opcode;
> +       bool enable;
> +};
> +
> +static struct cxl_mem_command mem_commands[] = {
> +       CXL_CMD(INVALID, NONE, 0, 0, "Reserved", false, 0),
> +};
> +
>  static int cxl_mem_wait_for_doorbell(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
>  {
>         const int timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(2000);
> @@ -268,8 +312,53 @@ static int cxl_mem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int cxl_mem_count_commands(void)
> +{
> +       int i, n = 0;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_commands); i++) {
> +               struct cxl_mem_command *c = &mem_commands[i];
> +
> +               if (c->enable)
> +                       n++;
> +       }
> +
> +       return n;
> +}
> +
>  static long cxl_mem_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> +       if (cmd == CXL_MEM_QUERY_COMMANDS) {
> +               struct cxl_mem_query_commands __user *q = (void __user *)arg;
> +               u32 n_commands;
> +               int i, j;
> +
> +               if (get_user(n_commands, (u32 __user *)arg))
> +                       return -EFAULT;
> +
> +               if (n_commands == 0)
> +                       return put_user(cxl_mem_count_commands(),
> +                                       (u32 __user *)arg);
> +
> +               for (i = 0, j = 0;
> +                    i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_commands) && j < n_commands; i++) {
> +                       struct cxl_mem_command *c = &mem_commands[i];
> +                       const struct cxl_command_info *info = &c->info;
> +
> +                       if (!c->enable)
> +                               continue;
> +
> +                       if (copy_to_user(&q->commands[j], info, sizeof(*info)))
> +                               return -EFAULT;
> +
> +                       if (copy_to_user(&q->commands[j].name, info->name,
> +                                        strlen(info->name)))
> +                               return -EFAULT;

Not sure why this is needed, see comment below about @name in
cxl_mem_query_commands.

> +
> +                       j++;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
>         return -ENOTTY;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h b/include/uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1d1e143f98ec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/cxl_mem.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> +/*
> + * CXL IOCTLs for Memory Devices
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _UAPI_CXL_MEM_H_
> +#define _UAPI_CXL_MEM_H_
> +
> +#if defined(__cplusplus)
> +extern "C" {
> +#endif
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: UAPI
> + *
> + * CXL memory devices expose UAPI to have a standard user interface.
> + * Userspace can refer to these structure definitions and UAPI formats
> + * to communicate to driver
> + */
> +
> +#define CXL_MEM_QUERY_COMMANDS _IOR('C', 1, struct cxl_mem_query_commands)
> +
> +#define CXL_MEM_COMMAND_NAME_LENGTH 32
> +
> +/**
> + * struct cxl_command_info - Command information returned from a query.
> + * @id: ID number for the command.
> + * @flags: Flags that specify command behavior.
> + *
> + *          - CXL_MEM_COMMAND_FLAG_TAINT: Using this command will taint the kernel.
> + * @size_in: Expected input size, or -1 if variable length.
> + * @size_out: Expected output size, or -1 if variable length.
> + * @name: Name describing the command.
> + *
> + * Represents a single command that is supported by both the driver and the
> + * hardware. The is returned as part of an array from the query ioctl. The
> + * following would be a command named "foobar" that takes a variable length
> + * input and returns 0 bytes of output.
> + *
> + *  - @id = 10
> + *  - @name = foobar
> + *  - @flags = 0
> + *  - @size_in = -1
> + *  - @size_out = 0
> + *
> + * See struct cxl_mem_query_commands.
> + */
> +struct cxl_command_info {
> +       __u32 id;
> +#define CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_INVALID 0
> +
> +       __u32 flags;
> +#define CXL_MEM_COMMAND_FLAG_NONE 0
> +#define CXL_MEM_COMMAND_FLAG_TAINT BIT(0)
> +
> +       __s32 size_in;
> +       __s32 size_out;
> +
> +       char name[32];

Why does the name for a command need to be shuffled back and forth
over the ioctl interface. Can't this be handled by a static lookup
table defined in the header?

> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct cxl_mem_query_commands - Query supported commands.
> + * @n_commands: In/out parameter. When @n_commands is > 0, the driver will
> + *             return min(num_support_commands, n_commands). When @n_commands
> + *             is 0, driver will return the number of total supported commands.
> + * @rsvd: Reserved for future use.
> + * @commands: Output array of supported commands. This array must be allocated
> + *            by userspace to be at least min(num_support_commands, @n_commands)
> + *
> + * Allow userspace to query the available commands supported by both the driver,
> + * and the hardware. Commands that aren't supported by either the driver, or the
> + * hardware are not returned in the query.
> + *
> + * Examples:
> + *
> + *  - { .n_commands = 0 } // Get number of supported commands
> + *  - { .n_commands = 15, .commands = buf } // Return first 15 (or less)
> + *    supported commands
> + *
> + *  See struct cxl_command_info.
> + */
> +struct cxl_mem_query_commands {
> +       /*
> +        * Input: Number of commands to return (space allocated by user)
> +        * Output: Number of commands supported by the driver/hardware
> +        *
> +        * If n_commands is 0, kernel will only return number of commands and
> +        * not try to populate commands[], thus allowing userspace to know how
> +        * much space to allocate
> +        */
> +       __u32 n_commands;
> +       __u32 rsvd;
> +
> +       struct cxl_command_info __user commands[]; /* out: supported commands */
> +};
> +
> +#if defined(__cplusplus)
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.29.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-09  0:24 [RFC PATCH v2 00/14] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/14] docs: cxl: Add basic documentation Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/14] cxl/acpi: Add an acpi_cxl module for the CXL interconnect Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/14] cxl/acpi: add OSC support Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/14] cxl/mem: Introduce a driver for CXL-2.0-Type-3 endpoints Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/14] cxl/mem: Map memory device registers Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/14] cxl/mem: Find device capabilities Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/14] cxl/mem: Implement polled mode mailbox Ben Widawsky
2021-01-07 19:05   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/14] cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  1:37   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2020-12-09  2:12     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  3:33       ` Dan Williams
2020-12-09 16:23         ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-10  3:32   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-14 17:29     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] cxl/mem: Add send command Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09 22:06   ` Dan Williams
2020-12-15 21:43     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-15 22:03       ` Dan Williams
2020-12-15 22:17         ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" " Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09 22:38   ` Dan Williams
2020-12-16 20:42     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] cxl: Add basic debugging Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  1:17   ` Dan Williams
2020-12-09  2:04     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  3:06       ` Dan Williams
2020-12-16 21:02         ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers of the CXL driver Ben Widawsky
2020-12-09  0:24 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] WIP/cxl/mem: Add get firmware for testing Ben Widawsky
2020-12-10  0:42   ` Dan Williams
2020-12-09  0:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/14] CXL 2.0 Support Verma, Vishal L
2020-12-09  0:47 ` Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4ipGMsKegzWtd+W8wr4mG7X9DtVeQYvL24Eyu1fB3AN=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=cbrowy@avery-design.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jcm@jonmasters.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).