From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D401C4161D for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD9D2146D for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="R3Ed13o9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CCD9D2146D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726772AbeKUGCE (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:02:04 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com ([209.85.167.194]:42949 "EHLO mail-oi1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726054AbeKUGCE (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:02:04 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id w13so2483044oiw.9 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:31:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mPuUQEYBbdmX9YQZXgJmtyhYqecyke5vkd8efhvPyoM=; b=R3Ed13o9+qhHqJKuYPjwcP/GA4os95QPcbLWfpGIUHGr6jcfVPlCdok9IF6AhGtXUF sr7ntx20T57rAZ+XvCmu/EnKcvEn5jbp12AtGNibp/uxF0q9S4xQhzya9VhpcvAH1Bei Wpzh8VfnMOmvrneG7c2l/qQgpALIhCbKsWOiYULC64FpIG/0y0gRZ9UQ7eAQg1kEKzT1 Kka7BtL7ltx1qWyoD283CIvqodoAY7iJoXbkW2tRBBujJ4smUAiGpN97apLvef0m2/OV ZRgYI4dEoPTsg9zXurK/aufIp/Zczlyqh/vBTpNZZtzvIOgIhFch5YYVBl7SmEp+pAUV MFZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mPuUQEYBbdmX9YQZXgJmtyhYqecyke5vkd8efhvPyoM=; b=OfcUoNWlzwG2vcrEJlCCmMU1zZgX4YRH/5n9JeycJbVH0pWovvU0uX2Pz+G8FCAM32 AkqFLbUanJ0r4OtsTfmwNvxkxBu+9jvdIffOis1260UAY0gWLIcH+bd9ddQQoalfW7p0 NPe0czYrnpAIFtTEE9I4ir6Z1PPMnW+QG42QiGbEt4K7SD7Wpja3h9EZB8qsze0ViIuF eqsl1/xhZw0STOkJVKWgY+4LDirlNI+DougLIxrMu0ci7Lu+6TRG3pgYT6h7ag8gnH1Z O5dOZf70JqPjSIQgqY3wuCCbpEBcRTClq6v93je+vMItOI8DI3hNDUmo/cpwYyc8dvYO DhbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJkl3qrDWhuph55mrhR8BNFlvSS/N9g9XMqqmO1ZsnXWqNfqmRV UWnqCvZ6yW+ugVCYHOueQa6z6x+KElF53IXUoB8ipA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dTJy/QRMKjzMqw195J8A89p8VCFRJyL9j8vfh1pXulfqIQ+3nD27XUI9aIfKFnd6ouVisqEDhz9HqJ0E6dDcA= X-Received: by 2002:aca:e691:: with SMTP id d139-v6mr1739289oih.232.1542742279302; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:31:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <154225759358.2499188.15268218778137905050.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <154225761038.2499188.1270468803677883744.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20181115061036.1575223d@silica.lan> <20181115162008.GO3759@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20181118110324.543edbd8@coco.lan> <8736rwgoem.fsf@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <8736rwgoem.fsf@intel.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:31:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [RFC PATCH 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS: Subsystem Profile To: jani.nikula@intel.com Cc: mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, zwisler@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , ksummit , linux-nvdimm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:09 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Hmm.. Perhaps the subsystem profile should point to IRC channels if any? > > Several subsystems use them in order to provide newbies some directions > > and to discuss other development issues. > > MAINTAINERS: > > C: URI for chat protocol, server and channel where developers > usually hang out, for example irc://server/channel. > > Alas very few subsystems have added that. > > I actually fear very few subsystems will add a subsystem profile for > that matter. I'm not too worried about the adoption rate of the Subsystem Profile. If a few subsystems pick it up and contributors find it useful then it will naturally proliferate, if not then perhaps the initial concern about contributor pain stumbling through the discovery of these local policy details was misplaced.