linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Schofield, Alison" <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cxl/mem: Demarcate vendor specific capability IDs
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:01:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jRm5Xw650GPUWOjAJ8sDQfOZ3yq2gMpVGho39eawLXrg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415232750.604112-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:27 PM Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Vendor capabilities occupy 0x8000 to 0xFFFF according to CXL 2.0 spec
> 8.2.8.2.1 CXL Device Capabilities. While they are not defined by the
> spec, they are allowed and not "unknown". Call this detail out in the
> logs to let users easily distinguish the difference.
>
> v2: Should be greater than or equal to (Ben)
>
> Fixes: 8adaf747c9f0b ("cxl/mem: Find device capabilities")
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/mem.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index c05617b0ba4b..28c7c29567b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -939,7 +939,10 @@ static int cxl_mem_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
>                         cxlm->memdev_regs = register_block;
>                         break;
>                 default:
> -                       dev_dbg(dev, "Unknown cap ID: %x (0x%x)\n", cap_id, offset);
> +                       if (cap_id >= 0x8000)
> +                               dev_dbg(dev, "Vendor cap ID: %x (0x%x)\n", cap_id, offset);
> +                       else
> +                               dev_dbg(dev, "Unknown cap ID: %x (0x%x)\n", cap_id, offset);

This wants the same %#x fixup that Vishal noted on patch2 [1], and I
think it would be useful to clarify that the second number is indeed
an offset: "Unknown cap_id: %#x offset: %#x\n"

[1]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/40063fe52fcaa066a42d352b13128b6762277542.camel@intel.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 23:26 [PATCH 1/3] cxl/mem: Fix register block offset calculation Ben Widawsky
2021-04-15 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] cxl/mem: Print unknown capability IDs as hex Ben Widawsky
2021-04-15 23:34   ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-04-15 23:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] cxl/mem: Demarcate vendor specific capability IDs Ben Widawsky
2021-04-15 23:27   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-04-15 23:37     ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-04-15 23:50       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-05-19 20:01     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2021-04-16  0:29   ` Dan Williams
2021-04-16  0:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] cxl/mem: Fix register block offset calculation Dan Williams
2021-04-16  2:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4jRm5Xw650GPUWOjAJ8sDQfOZ3yq2gMpVGho39eawLXrg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).