From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1031110AbbD1ThG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:37:06 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:34176 "EHLO
	mail-wg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1031064AbbD1ThC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:37:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150428125632.GD30852@infradead.org>
References: <20150418013256.25237.96403.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<20150418013618.25237.99555.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<20150418063829.GA29931@lst.de>
	<CAPcyv4hXX-nYM7GZ6rUsZsOdgcwV1zkNv1ee8Ve-O=mzU+uf6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150428125632.GD30852@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:37:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jtOS1RypuMfAau3M0fDKQk6vHpjrkuBUqzJ7qbR=gszQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 12/21] nd_pmem: add NFIT support to the
 pmem driver
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 12:37:09PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> At this point in the patch series I agree, but in later patches we
>> take advantage of nd bus services.  "[PATCH 15/21] nd: pmem label sets
>> and namespace instantiation" adds support for labeled pmem namespaces,
>> and in "[PATCH 19/21] nd: infrastructure for btt devices" we make pmem
>> capable of hosting btt instances.
>
> Thats fine, but still doesn't require moving it around.

I ended up not moving it in v2.  Let me know if the updated rationale
makes sense.