linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com>,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, ralf@linux-mips.org, paul.burton@mips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] Uprobes: Simplify uprobe_register() body
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:00:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW4zyC1v59bwe4D7j-K3Nw90FbDs2FZ5HuT2HOgR_oooUg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180809041856.1547-2-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:18 PM, Ravi Bangoria
<ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Simplify uprobe_register() function body and let __uprobe_register()
> handle everything. Also move dependency functions around to fix build
> failures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

> ---
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index ccc579a7d32e..471eac896635 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -840,13 +840,8 @@ register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
>         return err;
>  }
>
> -static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> -{
> -       consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
> -       return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, uc);
> -}
> -
> -static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> +static void
> +__uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
>         int err;
>
> @@ -860,24 +855,46 @@ static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *u
>  }
>
>  /*
> - * uprobe_register - register a probe
> + * uprobe_unregister - unregister a already registered probe.
> + * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
> + * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
> + * @uc: identify which probe if multiple probes are colocated.
> + */
> +void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> +{
> +       struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +
> +       uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> +       if (WARN_ON(!uprobe))
> +               return;
> +
> +       down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> +       __uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
> +       up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> +       put_uprobe(uprobe);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister);
> +
> +/*
> + * __uprobe_register - register a probe
>   * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be placed.
>   * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
>   * @uc: information on howto handle the probe..
>   *
> - * Apart from the access refcount, uprobe_register() takes a creation
> + * Apart from the access refcount, __uprobe_register() takes a creation
>   * refcount (thro alloc_uprobe) if and only if this @uprobe is getting
>   * inserted into the rbtree (i.e first consumer for a @inode:@offset
>   * tuple).  Creation refcount stops uprobe_unregister from freeing the
>   * @uprobe even before the register operation is complete. Creation
>   * refcount is released when the last @uc for the @uprobe
> - * unregisters. Caller of uprobe_register() is required to keep @inode
> + * unregisters. Caller of __uprobe_register() is required to keep @inode
>   * (and the containing mount) referenced.
>   *
>   * Return errno if it cannot successully install probes
>   * else return 0 (success)
>   */
> -int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> +static int __uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> +                            struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
>         struct uprobe *uprobe;
>         int ret;
> @@ -904,7 +921,8 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
>         down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
>         ret = -EAGAIN;
>         if (likely(uprobe_is_active(uprobe))) {
> -               ret = __uprobe_register(uprobe, uc);
> +               consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
> +               ret = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, uc);
>                 if (ret)
>                         __uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
>         }
> @@ -915,6 +933,12 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
>                 goto retry;
>         return ret;
>  }
> +
> +int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> +                   struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> +{
> +       return __uprobe_register(inode, offset, uc);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_register);
>
>  /*
> @@ -946,27 +970,6 @@ int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -/*
> - * uprobe_unregister - unregister a already registered probe.
> - * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
> - * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
> - * @uc: identify which probe if multiple probes are colocated.
> - */
> -void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> -{
> -       struct uprobe *uprobe;
> -
> -       uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> -       if (WARN_ON(!uprobe))
> -               return;
> -
> -       down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> -       __uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
> -       up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> -       put_uprobe(uprobe);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister);
> -
>  static int unapply_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>         struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> --
> 2.14.4
>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-11  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-09  4:18 [PATCH v8 0/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] Uprobes: Simplify uprobe_register() body Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:00   ` Song Liu [this message]
2018-08-13  8:56   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-14  0:07     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] Uprobe: Additional argument arch_uprobe to uprobe_write_opcode() Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:01   ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:51   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09 14:38   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-10 19:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-11  6:14       ` Song Liu
2018-08-14  0:01         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14  0:05           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-11  7:57   ` Song Liu
2018-08-11 15:37     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-13  5:47     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13  7:38       ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 11:50       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 13:01         ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 13:17           ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 14:26             ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 14:51             ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 17:12             ` Song Liu
2018-08-14  4:37               ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-14 16:35                 ` Song Liu
2018-08-14  0:03         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-13 16:50       ` Song Liu
2018-08-13 10:03   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13 11:23     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-14  8:56   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] Uprobes/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:04   ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:50   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] trace_uprobe/sdt: " Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:12   ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:19     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13  8:49       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13 16:27         ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:48   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] perf probe: Support SDT markers having reference counter (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 16:55 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPhsuW4zyC1v59bwe4D7j-K3Nw90FbDs2FZ5HuT2HOgR_oooUg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexis.berlemont@gmail.com \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).