From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf 0/4] vmalloc: bpf: introduce VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:34:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6LY8g6SZpW0CBOe22FUd2e3oSq4RW1GDxZoPmHYBqwvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlnCBqNWxSm3M3xB@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 12:05 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 09:44:09AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > Changes v3 => v4:
> > 1. Fix __weak module_alloc_huge; remove unused vmalloc_huge; rename
> > __vmalloc_huge => vmalloc_huge. (Christoph Hellwig)
> > 2. Use vzalloc (as it was before vmalloc_no_huge) and clean up comments in
> > kvm_s390_pv_alloc_vm.
> >
> > Changes v2 => v3:
> > 1. Use __vmalloc_huge in alloc_large_system_hash.
> > 2. Use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for new functions. (Christoph Hellwig)
> > 3. Add more description about the issues and changes.(Christoph Hellwig,
> > Rick Edgecombe).
> >
> > Changes v1 => v2:
> > 1. Add vmalloc_huge(). (Christoph Hellwig)
> > 2. Add module_alloc_huge(). (Christoph Hellwig)
> > 3. Add Fixes tag and Link tag. (Thorsten Leemhuis)
> >
> > Enabling HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC on x86_64 and use it for bpf_prog_pack has
> > caused some issues [1], as many users of vmalloc are not yet ready to
> > handle huge pages. To enable a more smooth transition to use huge page
> > backed vmalloc memory, this set replaces VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP flag with an new
> > opt-in flag, VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP. More discussions about this topic can be
> > found at [2].
> >
> > Patch 1 removes VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP and adds VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP.
> > Patch 2 uses VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP in bpf_prog_pack.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220204185742.271030-1-song@kernel.org/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220330225642.1163897-1-song@kernel.org/
>
> Looks good except for that I think this should just wait for v5.19. The
> fixes are so large I can't see why this needs to be rushed in other than
> the first assumptions of the optimizations had some flaws addressed here.
We need these changes to fix issues like [3]. Note that there might
still be some
undiscovered issues with huge page backed vmalloc memory on powerpc, which
had HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC enabled since the 5.15 kernel. As we
agreed, the new opt-in flag is a safer approach here. We probably should have
1/4 and 2/4 back ported to stable. Therefore, I think shipping this
set now would
give us a more reliable 5.18 release.
Does this make sense?
Thanks,
Song
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/14444103-d51b-0fb3-ee63-c3f182f0b546@molgen.mpg.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-16 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220415164413.2727220-1-song@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20220415164413.2727220-2-song@kernel.org>
2022-04-15 17:43 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 1/4] vmalloc: replace VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <20220415164413.2727220-3-song@kernel.org>
2022-04-15 17:43 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 2/4] page_alloc: use vmalloc_huge for large system hash Rik van Riel
2022-04-25 7:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-04-25 8:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-25 8:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <20220415164413.2727220-4-song@kernel.org>
2022-04-15 18:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 3/4] module: introduce module_alloc_huge Rik van Riel
2022-06-16 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-15 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 0/4] vmalloc: bpf: introduce VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-16 1:34 ` Song Liu [this message]
2022-04-16 1:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-16 1:43 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-16 5:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-16 19:55 ` Song Liu
2022-04-16 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-16 22:26 ` Song Liu
2022-04-18 10:06 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-19 0:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-19 1:56 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-19 5:36 ` Song Liu
2022-04-19 18:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-19 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-20 2:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-04-20 2:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-20 14:42 ` Song Liu
2022-04-20 18:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-21 3:25 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21 5:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-21 6:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-21 9:07 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21 8:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-21 23:30 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22 0:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22 1:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22 2:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22 2:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21 15:47 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-21 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22 0:12 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22 2:29 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22 2:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22 16:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22 3:08 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22 4:31 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22 17:10 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22 20:22 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22 3:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21 9:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-19 21:24 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-19 23:58 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-20 7:58 ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 18:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-24 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-25 6:48 ` Song Liu
2022-04-21 3:19 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPhsuW6LY8g6SZpW0CBOe22FUd2e3oSq4RW1GDxZoPmHYBqwvw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=song@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).