From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/17] HID: allow to change the report descriptor from an eBPF program
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:03:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7W_pGHFb4MyZHaFk9TV9zYaLXoTS_0hLoeqGOB8htRBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-hwJL+A5hqzGBCVCtp4diuM-_Aii+HAKNfz5oMZBTHCQrEkQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 9:20 AM Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:10 PM Song Liu <song@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:17 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> > <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Make use of BPF_HID_ATTACH_RDESC_FIXUP so we can trigger an rdesc fixup
> > > in the bpf world.
> > >
> > > Whenever the program gets attached/detached, the device is reconnected
> > > meaning that userspace will see it disappearing and reappearing with
> > > the new report descriptor.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > changes in v3:
> > > - ensure the ctx.size is properly bounded by allocated size
> > > - s/link_attached/post_link_attach/
> > > - removed the switch statement with only one case
> > >
> > > changes in v2:
> > > - split the series by bpf/libbpf/hid/selftests and samples
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 3 +-
> > > include/linux/hid.h | 6 ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c b/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c
> > > index 5060ebcb9979..45c87ff47324 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c
> > > @@ -50,6 +50,14 @@ static struct hid_device *hid_bpf_fd_to_hdev(int fd)
> > > return hdev;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int hid_reconnect(struct hid_device *hdev)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!test_and_set_bit(ffs(HID_STAT_REPROBED), &hdev->status))
> > > + return device_reprobe(&hdev->dev);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int hid_bpf_pre_link_attach(struct hid_device *hdev, enum bpf_hid_attach_type type)
> > > {
> > > int err = 0;
> > > @@ -92,6 +100,12 @@ static int hid_bpf_pre_link_attach(struct hid_device *hdev, enum bpf_hid_attach_
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void hid_bpf_post_link_attach(struct hid_device *hdev, enum bpf_hid_attach_type type)
> > > +{
> > > + if (type == BPF_HID_ATTACH_RDESC_FIXUP)
> > > + hid_reconnect(hdev);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void hid_bpf_array_detach(struct hid_device *hdev, enum bpf_hid_attach_type type)
> > > {
> > > switch (type) {
> > > @@ -99,6 +113,9 @@ static void hid_bpf_array_detach(struct hid_device *hdev, enum bpf_hid_attach_ty
> > > kfree(hdev->bpf.device_data);
> > > hdev->bpf.device_data = NULL;
> > > break;
> > > + case BPF_HID_ATTACH_RDESC_FIXUP:
> > > + hid_reconnect(hdev);
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > /* do nothing */
> > > break;
> > > @@ -116,6 +133,9 @@ static int hid_bpf_run_progs(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_bpf_ctx_kern *c
> > > case HID_BPF_DEVICE_EVENT:
> > > type = BPF_HID_ATTACH_DEVICE_EVENT;
> > > break;
> > > + case HID_BPF_RDESC_FIXUP:
> > > + type = BPF_HID_ATTACH_RDESC_FIXUP;
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > @@ -155,11 +175,53 @@ u8 *hid_bpf_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *data, int *size)
> > > return ctx.data;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +u8 *hid_bpf_report_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *rdesc, unsigned int *size)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > + struct hid_bpf_ctx_kern ctx = {
> > > + .type = HID_BPF_RDESC_FIXUP,
> > > + .hdev = hdev,
> > > + .size = *size,
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + if (bpf_hid_link_empty(&hdev->bpf, BPF_HID_ATTACH_RDESC_FIXUP))
> >
> > Do we need to lock bpf_hid_mutex before calling bpf_hid_link_empty()?
> > (or maybe we
> > already did?)
>
> The mutex is not locked before this call, indeed.
>
> However, bpf_hid_link_empty() is an inlined function that just calls
> in the end list_empty(). Given that all the list heads are created
> just once for the entire life of the HID device, I *think* this is
> thread safe and does not require mutex locking.
Hmm.. I guess you are right.
>
> (I might be wrong)
>
> So when first plugging in the device, if there is a fighting process
> that attempts to add a program, if the program managed to insert
> itself before we enter this code, then the list won't be empty and we
> will execute BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(), and if not, well, we ignore it and
> wait for reconnect().
>
> But now I am starting to wonder if I need to also protect
> BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY() under bpf_hid_mutex...
I think this is not necessary.
Thanks,
Song
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-18 16:15 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/17] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/17] bpf: add new is_sys_admin_prog_type() helper Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 18:07 ` Song Liu
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/17] bpf: introduce hid program type Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 20:48 ` Song Liu
2022-03-21 16:07 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-21 21:51 ` Song Liu
2022-03-22 11:06 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/17] bpf/verifier: prevent non GPL programs to be loaded against HID Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 20:51 ` Song Liu
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/17] libbpf: add HID program type and API Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 20:53 ` Song Liu
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/17] HID: hook up with bpf Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 21:02 ` Song Liu
2022-03-18 21:04 ` Song Liu
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/17] HID: allow to change the report descriptor from an eBPF program Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 21:10 ` Song Liu
2022-03-21 16:20 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-21 22:03 ` Song Liu [this message]
2022-03-22 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-23 16:08 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-25 17:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-28 6:56 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-28 21:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-29 13:53 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-04-01 13:21 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-30 21:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/17] selftests/bpf: add tests for the HID-bpf initial implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/17] selftests/bpf: add report descriptor fixup tests Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/17] selftests/bpf: Add a test for BPF_F_INSERT_HEAD Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/17] selftests/bpf: add test for user call of HID bpf programs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/17] samples/bpf: add new hid_mouse example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/17] bpf/hid: add more HID helpers Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 21:19 ` Song Liu
2022-03-21 16:24 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/17] HID: bpf: implement hid_bpf_get|set_bits Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 21:20 ` Song Liu
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/17] HID: add implementation of bpf_hid_raw_request Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/17] selftests/bpf: add tests for hid_{get|set}_bits helpers Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/17] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/17] Documentation: add HID-BPF docs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-03-18 18:05 ` Song Liu
2022-03-29 13:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/17] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Tero Kristo
2022-04-01 9:37 ` Benjamin Tissoires
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPhsuW7W_pGHFb4MyZHaFk9TV9zYaLXoTS_0hLoeqGOB8htRBg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=song@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).