From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752397AbbJFK3g (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:29:36 -0400
Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:36157 "EHLO
	mail-io0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751340AbbJFK3e (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:29:34 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151006102548.GC26433@leverpostej>
References: <1444064531-25607-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
	<1444064531-25607-22-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
	<20151006090959.GO21513@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAPvkgC31-gUmetN0S=t9yJ30M8=x7Y7prxO40tiEB=zJiUvwBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151006102548.GC26433@leverpostej>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:29:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPvkgC3gcS+Hpp28-dxTZLEcYbhethfYAtsQ5p1Fmb1WZw6Yrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/22] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1
 to sysfs
From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Edward Nevill <edward.nevill@linaro.org>, aph@redhat.com,
        james.morse@arm.com, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
        dave.martin@arm.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 6 October 2015 at 11:25, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
>> On 6 October 2015 at 10:09, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:02:10PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> >> +static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     int cpu, ret;
>> >> +
>> >> +     for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>> >> +             struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> >> +
>> >> +             if (!dev)
>> >> +                     return -1;
>> >
>> > NAK.  Go figure out why, I'm too lazy to tell you.
>>
>> I will correct the return code to be -ENODEV.
>> Was that the reasoning behind the NAK?
>
> I suspect the half-initialised sysfs groups also have something to do
> with it...

Okay, cheers Mark, I see what you mean.

>
> Mark.
>
>>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +             ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &cpuregs_attr_group);
>> >> +             if (ret)
>> >> +                     return ret;
>> >> +     }
>> >> +
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
>> >> --
>> >> 1.7.9.5
>>