From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755365AbaIBVgb (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:36:31 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:44878 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbaIBVg0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:36:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/19] irqchip: gic: Provide support for interrupt grouping Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Catalin Marinas In-Reply-To: <20140902193355.GW30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:36:20 +0100 Cc: Daniel Thompson , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net" , "patches@linaro.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , John Stultz , Anton Vorontsov , Colin Cross , "kernel-team@android.com" , Rob Herring , Linus Walleij , Ben Dooks , Dave P Martin , Fabio Estevam , Frederic Weisbecker , Nicolas Pitre , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Nicolas Pitre , Christoffer Dall , Sricharan R , Marc Zyngier Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: References: <1408466769-20004-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <1409662853-29313-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <1409662853-29313-7-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <20140902193355.GW30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: Russell King - ARM Linux X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2 Sep 2014, at 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >> index 4b959e6..423707c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ >> #include >> >> #include >> +#ifdef CONFIG_FIQ >> +#include >> +#endif > > Is there much advantage to this ifdef over providing a dummy asm/fiq.h > in ARM64? While it’s unlikely we’ll use FIQs on arm64 (they are generally reserved for the secure world/firmware), I don’t mind an empty asm/fiq.h file. Catalin