From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 08:31:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 08:31:07 -0400 Received: from ucu-105-116.ucu.uu.nl ([131.211.105.116]:61252 "EHLO ronald.bitfreak.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 08:30:50 -0400 From: "Ronald Bultje" To: Subject: a memory-related problem? Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:37:03 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I just added 128 MB of RAM to my machine which already had 128 MB and which has 128 MB swap. 128 MB RAM + 128 MB swap (either the new or the old 128 MB RAM) works, but the combination of that, 256 MB RAM + 128 MB swap, crashes the compu during startup with either an "unresolved- symbols in init" message (which is completely random, each boot shows different unresolved references) or with oopses right after starting init. (btw is it useful to write down these oopses on paper, reboot with only 128 MB RAM to ksymoops them?) Any idea on what's wrong? I thought the memory could be broken but when booting with only the new memory in the machine, it does startup so I suppose the memory itself is okay (but I'm not a hardware expert). Or is this "normal behaviour" when a machine doesn't follow swap=2xRAM? (and then again, why did it startup with 128MB/swap?) distro = RedHat-7.0 (with updates from redhat.com installed) Kernel = 2.4.4 gcc = 2.96 glibc = 2.2 system = p-II 400 MHz, 128 MB swap, 440BX (abit p6b) mainboard memory is (133 MHz) SDRAM memory (running at 100 MHz) [please CC me, I'm currently not subscribed] Regards, Ronald Bultje