From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F060C3F2D7 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 12:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E2A2073B for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 12:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=goldelico.com header.i=@goldelico.com header.b="mPQLb0f5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728506AbgCCMg5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:36:57 -0500 Received: from mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.81]:20281 "EHLO mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727585AbgCCMg5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:36:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1583239014; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=goldelico.com; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=VMrHKMbD83NkBboxDHGdQ72KMc222y8alTEvMYhCHlU=; b=mPQLb0f5ASKIwloweC0L6YW6lSVEbG946OwHgHpPu6I0Nv1ocdhrzkVjFSO036nsvd 866CG2wJ9HI+ydwaRXGXASYPn0OuIniDAFHI7If2GgHiG6EuGE+TdCkP9hgoLeH2SAbv Mt+s9KsQGl7qgYVhcWoKatnK4eyi8GK/o49a91dHKa6C3pdFGmfMjaVxj2tfthVdYOum GelULxTtnKWyqQKC2DtpkMM9TK/OkhRAHyXMkVMmD8oy3Z7Oq6S+50Tmuk5x/iB+xyEL ZCJz7FpTYaM6Ak1nTf5DLW8mCSZTf+nt8ooCx7w4ujvJDrzp7Ost1kDioM8Xg2l5SwFT 0EuA== X-RZG-AUTH: ":JGIXVUS7cutRB/49FwqZ7WcJeFKiMgPgp8VKxflSZ1P34KBj7wpz8NMGHPrpwDGvxw==" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from imac.fritz.box by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.2.0 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id y0a02cw23CaqIDD (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:36:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] MIPS: DTS: CI20: fix PMU definitions for ACT8600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" In-Reply-To: <20200303123214.GA15333@alpha.franken.de> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:36:51 +0100 Cc: Paul Boddie , Paul Cercueil , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , Miquel Raynal , Andi Kleen , Kees Cook , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Eric W. Biederman" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Discussions about the Letux Kernel , stable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <02f18080fa0e0c214b40431749ca1ce514c53d37.1583005548.git.hns@goldelico.com> <20200303101818.GA12103@alpha.franken.de> <85F9D066-EAF6-4840-8F54-24E6D8A534DC@goldelico.com> <20200303123214.GA15333@alpha.franken.de> To: Thomas Bogendoerfer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Am 03.03.2020 um 13:32 schrieb Thomas Bogendoerfer = : >=20 > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 01:10:22PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >>> And please seperate fixes from improvments, thank you. >>=20 >> What do you mean by "separate"? Two separate patches? >> This patch only contains fixes (which I would consider >> all of them to be improvements). >=20 > There are two patches with Fixes tag, which IMHO should go > into 5.6 via mips-fixes branch. All others are going > via mips-next into 5.7. So it helps me, if they come in different > patch series (or as single patches). Ah, ok. I didn't know that there are two branches and originally I didn't see them as fixes - they became by review suggestions. > I see other DT changes in your other patch series. Are the changes > there independent from each other or do they require correct order > when appling them ? I think they are independent. Only the fixes should go to stable as = well. The others can wait. >=20 > Thomas. BR and thanks, Nikolaus