From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753604AbdCBA1p convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:27:45 -0500
Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([65.50.211.136]:33142 "EHLO mail.zytor.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753490AbdCBA1n (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:27:43 -0500
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:26:29 -0800
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20170302001853.GA27097@altlinux.org>
References: <20170226010156.GA28831@altlinux.org> <CAK8P3a0YX3RGAqWN0mwUJtBsqUX0C+QRtJLrT_UA=wX6Z+q0DA@mail.gmail.com> <20170302001853.GA27097@altlinux.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/uapi: fix asm/signal.h userspace compilation error
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        x86@kernel.org
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From: hpa@zytor.com
Message-ID: <D0D3BAFB-0556-4DBB-898C-A42719BA07BE@zytor.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On March 1, 2017 4:18:54 PM PST, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> wrote:
>Replace size_t to fix the following asm/signal.h userspace compilation
>error:
>
>/usr/include/asm/signal.h:126:2: error: unknown type name 'size_t'
>  size_t ss_size;
>
>size_t is replaced with __kernel_size_t in all cases except x32 where
>unsigned int has to be used instead.
>
>Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
>---
>v2: create a separate patch for x86,
>    replace size_t instead of including <stddef.h>.
>
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>index 8264f47..f80473f 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>@@ -127,7 +127,11 @@ struct sigaction {
> typedef struct sigaltstack {
> 	void __user *ss_sp;
> 	int ss_flags;
>-	size_t ss_size;
>+#if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(__ILP32__)
>+	unsigned int ss_size;
>+#else
>+	__kernel_size_t ss_size;
>+#endif
> } stack_t;
> 
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */

Sounds like we still ought to make this a type by itself.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.