From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:38:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:37:51 -0400 Received: from mail.myrio.com ([63.109.146.2]:6909 "HELO smtp1.myrio.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:37:39 -0400 Message-ID: From: Torrey Hoffman To: "'tegeran@home.com'" , Alan Cox , mikpe@csd.uu.se Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ionut@cs.columbia.edu Subject: RE: [PATCH,RFC] make ide-scsi more selective Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:37:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Here's an end-user perspective for you... I just spent 2 days > trying to > figure out how to use my CD-RW drive to read when using > ide-scsi, before > I finnaly realized that I had to do it by disabling ATAPI CD > support and > enabling SCSI CD support.. Also note: The SCSI-CD driver is also required if you want any kind of reasonable performance for cdparanoia (the music CD ripper), even for perfectly ordinary CD or DVD drives. This took me a couple tries last weekend, and I even knew what the problem was. Is there _any_ hardware where the ide-cd driver works better than ide-scsi emulation? If not, I suppose the only reason to keep it around is so people don't need to compile all the SCSI support just for ordinary access to ISO-9660 cds with an IDE CDROM. In the meantime, perhaps the kernel configuration help could mention this little gotcha? And maybe distributions should make ide-scsi the default? At least CD ripping would work "out of the box" like that. Torrey Hoffman torrey.hoffman@myrio.com