From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 May 2002 19:42:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 May 2002 19:42:57 -0400 Received: from fmr02.intel.com ([192.55.52.25]:60111 "EHLO caduceus.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 May 2002 19:42:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Woodruff, Robert J" To: "'Alan Cox'" , "Woodruff, Robert J" Cc: russ@elegant-software.com, Tony.P.Lee@nokia.com, wookie@osdl.org, lmb@suse.de, "Woodruff, Robert J" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com Subject: RE: InfiniBand BOF @ LSM - topics of interest Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 16:42:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > so someone could invent a new address family for sockets, > say AF_INFINIBANDO, that is much more light weight than the existing TCP/IP > stack. > Thus with a small change to the application, a good performance increase can > be attained. >Shouldn't be too hard. It looks like its basically AF_PACKET combined with >the infiniband notions of security. Maybe a little higher level than raw packets, but yes, a light-weight sockets protocol driver.