From: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "sean.j.christopherson@intel.com"
<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
"wanpengli@tencent.com" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
"jmattson@google.com" <jmattson@google.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>,
"rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix APIC page invalidation race
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:36:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D9A42B2E-7BB1-4E70-98CD-40D295D9DB1A@nutanix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d2d2faf-116f-8c71-fda2-3fc052952dee@redhat.com>
> On Jun 9, 2020, at 18:54, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> No need to resend, the patch is good. Here is my take on the commit message:
Thank you Paolo! Your commit message is much clearer.
I really appreciate your great job.
Best
Eiichi
>
> Commit b1394e745b94 ("KVM: x86: fix APIC page invalidation") tried
> to fix inappropriate APIC page invalidation by re-introducing arch
> specific kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() and calling it from
> kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start. However, the patch left a
> possible race where the VMCS APIC address cache is updated *before*
> it is unmapped:
>
> (Invalidator) kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start()
> (Invalidator) kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD)
> (KVM VCPU) vcpu_enter_guest()
> (KVM VCPU) kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page()
> (Invalidator) actually unmap page
>
> Because of the above race, there can be a mismatch between the
> host physical address stored in the APIC_ACCESS_PAGE VMCS field and
> the host physical address stored in the EPT entry for the APIC GPA
> (0xfee0000). When this happens, the processor will not trap APIC
> accesses, and will instead show the raw contents of the APIC-access page.
> Because Windows OS periodically checks for unexpected modifications to
> the LAPIC register, this will show up as a BSOD crash with BugCheck
> CRITICAL_STRUCTURE_CORRUPTION (109) we are currently seeing in
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugzilla.redhat.com_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D1751017&d=DwIDaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=dy01Dr4Ly8mhvnUdx1pZhhT1bkq4h9z5aVWu3paoZtk&m=yo6pYK4bnrvDLz_RwGyvwtJEY6oWkg-9XGlbPBq1B2g&s=7tKkV92x4mCNLQ7miJIanMVqokYNJdjrcK4Rqqb_h7s&e= .
>
> The root cause of the issue is that kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
> cannot guarantee that no additional references are taken to the pages in
> the range before kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(). Fortunately,
> this case is supported by the MMU notifier API, as documented in
> include/linux/mmu_notifier.h:
>
> * If the subsystem
> * can't guarantee that no additional references are taken to
> * the pages in the range, it has to implement the
> * invalidate_range() notifier to remove any references taken
> * after invalidate_range_start().
>
> The fix therefore is to reload the APIC-access page field in the VMCS
> from kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() instead of ..._range_start().
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-09 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-06 4:26 [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix APIC page invalidation race Eiichi Tsukata
2020-06-06 5:00 ` Eiichi Tsukata
2020-06-08 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-09 1:04 ` Eiichi Tsukata
2020-06-09 9:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-09 13:36 ` Eiichi Tsukata [this message]
[not found] ` <202006191317431160122@wangsu.com>
2020-06-19 12:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D9A42B2E-7BB1-4E70-98CD-40D295D9DB1A@nutanix.com \
--to=eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).