RE: [PATCH V2 net-next 5/7] net: fec: add MAC internal delayed clock feature support

[Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> Sent: 2021年7月28日 22:11
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; kuba@kernel.org; robh+dt@kernel.org;
> shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; kernel@pengutronix.de;
> festevam@gmail.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 5/7] net: fec: add MAC internal delayed clock
> feature support
> 
> > +	/* For rgmii internal delay, valid values are 0ps and 2000ps */
> > +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "tx-internal-delay-ps", &rgmii_delay))
> > +		fep->rgmii_txc_dly = true;
> > +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "rx-internal-delay-ps", &rgmii_delay))
> > +		fep->rgmii_rxc_dly = true;
> 
> I don't see any validation of the only supported values are 0ps and 2000ps.

Hi Andrew,

I also take this into account, since I have limited the value to 0 and 2000 in fec dt-bindings.
It will report error when run dtbs_check if value is not invalid. Another reason is that actually
the value is not program to hardware, we only enable RGMII delay or not. If need, I think we
can only add a dev_warn() here, instead of stop the probe process?

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> 	Andrew