linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 04/15] PCI: Add pci_find_vsec_capability() to find a specific VSEC
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:32:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM5PR12MB183517EF9646E366F3F657A7DA859@DM5PR12MB1835.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210218192730.GA996712@bjorn-Precision-5520>

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 19:27:30, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> 
wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:03:58PM +0100, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> > Add pci_find_vsec_capability() to locate a Vendor-Specific Extended
> > Capability with the specified VSEC ID.
> > 
> > The Vendor-Specific Extended Capability (VSEC) allows one or more
> > proprietary capabilities defined by the vendor which aren't standard
> > or shared between vendors.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
> 
> Beautiful, thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c   | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/pci.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index b9fecc2..aef217c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -693,6 +693,36 @@ u8 pci_find_ht_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, int ht_cap)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_find_ht_capability);
> >  
> >  /**
> > + * pci_find_vsec_capability - Find a vendor-specific extended capability
> > + * @dev: PCI device to query
> > + * @vendor: Vendor ID for which capability is defined
> > + * @cap: Vendor-specific capability ID
> > + *
> > + * If @dev has Vendor ID @vendor, search for a VSEC capability with
> > + * VSEC ID @cap. If found, return the capability offset in
> > + * config space; otherwise return 0.
> > + */
> > +u16 pci_find_vsec_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 vendor, int cap)
> > +{
> > +	u16 vsec = 0;
> > +	u32 header;
> > +
> > +	if (vendor != dev->vendor)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	while ((vsec = pci_find_next_ext_capability(dev, vsec,
> > +						     PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VNDR))) {
> > +		if (pci_read_config_dword(dev, vsec + PCI_VNDR_HEADER,
> > +					  &header) == PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL &&
> > +		    PCI_VNDR_HEADER_ID(header) == cap)
> > +			return vsec;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_find_vsec_capability);
> > +
> > +/**
> >   * pci_find_parent_resource - return resource region of parent bus of given
> >   *			      region
> >   * @dev: PCI device structure contains resources to be searched
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index b32126d..814f814 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -1077,6 +1077,7 @@ u8 pci_find_next_ht_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 pos, int ht_cap);
> >  u16 pci_find_ext_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, int cap);
> >  u16 pci_find_next_ext_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 pos, int cap);
> >  struct pci_bus *pci_find_next_bus(const struct pci_bus *from);
> > +u16 pci_find_vsec_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 vendor, int cap);
> 
> If you do any updates for other reasons, slide this up one more line
> so we have:
> 
>   u16 pci_find_ext_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, int cap);
>   u16 pci_find_next_ext_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 pos, int cap);
>   u16 pci_find_vsec_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 vendor, int cap);
> 
>   struct pci_bus *pci_find_next_bus(const struct pci_bus *from);
> 
> I don't know why pci_find_next_bus() got stuck with the capability
> things.  It doesn't have anything to do with finding capabilities.  It
> goes more with pci_get_device(), etc.
> 
> But don't roll the series just for that.

Thanks, Bjorn.
I can those arrangements if some request comes along.
I can also move the pci_find_next_bus() next to the pci_get_device() if 
you like.

-Gustavo

> 
> >  u64 pci_get_dsn(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18 19:03 [PATCH v7 00/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: HDMA support Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:03 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add writeq() and readq() for 64 bits architectures Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:03 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix comments offset characters' alignment Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:03 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add support for the HDMA feature Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:03 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] PCI: Add pci_find_vsec_capability() to find a specific VSEC Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-18 21:32     ` Gustavo Pimentel [this message]
2021-02-18 19:03 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add PCIe VSEC data retrieval support Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add device_prep_interleave_dma() support Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Improve number of channels check Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Reorder variables to keep consistency Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Improve the linked list and data blocks definition Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Change linked list and data blocks offset and sizes Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move struct dentry variable from static definition into dw_edma struct Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix crash on loading/unloading driver Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Change DMA abreviation from lower into upper case Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Revert fix scatter-gather address calculation Gustavo Pimentel
2021-02-18 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add pcim_iomap_table return check Gustavo Pimentel
2021-03-16 17:29 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: HDMA support Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM5PR12MB183517EF9646E366F3F657A7DA859@DM5PR12MB1835.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).