From: "Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie" <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
"eswara.kota@linux.intel.com" <eswara.kota@linux.intel.com>,
"vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com"
<vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>,
"Raja Subramanian,
Lakshmi Bai" <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: intel: Add Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 00:39:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB3721B821FA9C985C8C386D38DD260@DM6PR11MB3721.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901055135.GY2639@vkoul-mobl>
Resend the reply.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:52 PM
> To: Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
> <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>
> Cc: kishon@ti.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; Shevchenko, Andriy
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>; eswara.kota@linux.intel.com;
> vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi
> Bai <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: intel: Add Keem Bay eMMC
> PHY bindings
>
> On 01-09-20, 04:58, Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-
> > > phy.yaml#"
> > > > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings
> > >
> > > This seems same as
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-emmc-phy.yaml,
> why
> > > not add a new compatible in lgm binding, or did I miss a difference?
> >
> > AFAIK, LGM make use of syscon node, whilst KMB does not.
> > And LGM and KMB belongs to different SoC family. So, I prefer them to
> > be in separate file.
> >
> > Having said that, with few changes in wordings in title and
> > description, I think we can make it generic and can be used across few
> products.
>
> The bindings seems quite similar. We can have two drivers loaded using two
> compatible but binding description can be made same
Noted. I can make the change i.e. add Keem Bay compatible string in lgm
binding document and drop Keem Bay binding document.
Rob and Vadivel, is there any objection? If not, I will proceed with v9 in the
next one or two days.
>
> --
> ~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-09 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-21 11:37 [PATCH v7 0/3] phy: intel: Add Keem Bay eMMC PHY support Wan Ahmad Zainie
2020-08-21 11:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] phy: intel: Rename phy-intel to phy-intel-lgm Wan Ahmad Zainie
2020-08-31 1:40 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-08-21 11:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: intel: Add Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings Wan Ahmad Zainie
2020-08-31 9:10 ` Vinod Koul
2020-09-01 4:58 ` Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
2020-09-01 5:51 ` Vinod Koul
2020-09-09 0:39 ` Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie [this message]
2020-08-21 11:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] phy: intel: Add Keem Bay eMMC PHY support Wan Ahmad Zainie
2020-08-21 12:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-31 9:19 ` Vinod Koul
2020-09-01 4:49 ` Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB3721B821FA9C985C8C386D38DD260@DM6PR11MB3721.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eswara.kota@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).