From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9647C2BB1D for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F94221E9 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=intel.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@intel.onmicrosoft.com header.b="sCZnqzN3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726748AbgDQFzo (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 01:55:44 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:53911 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726610AbgDQFzo (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 01:55:44 -0400 IronPort-SDR: U9u1JU5qwqizVgMNIL2wRsjnJuJSwmn4DDQLHVZQ8Rfli1Lmn4bRghzuV3P/8h3EgUm7h2GzrO WpO7Ns7xcmUA== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Apr 2020 22:55:42 -0700 IronPort-SDR: iE7pmHXXcInbRzt/cr9tskj0laldmMsPhxnVV8VLiNoX0eYBo9aQsxwR6LQYdSiwZytk5aTPG9 wRmYA+dk+Pyg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,393,1580803200"; d="scan'208";a="428118665" Received: from orsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.131]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Apr 2020 22:55:42 -0700 Received: from ORSEDG002.ED.cps.intel.com (10.7.248.5) by ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 22:55:41 -0700 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.104) by edgegateway.intel.com (134.134.137.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 22:55:41 -0700 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=eUjUN+QPusQwQLGqrnRofg5NBT7bC6IZduPJ5dbOmdCd5CqNhs6VXjJofpVGBi5qNCLFqNgv4QWX4nLYliO0IOAukYUE0eEeEQ1fOQ48yw2HDcZjdR76mQiuM2ex1S27croA4Y9d4P54cvL9d17PJaFHOzhWKd8BF4gJOV7QP+OdLAY8m2WXTs1wMxaJRvO5MHe2GhtSBU9bqilSQTdWI1cZB2lpUbzCrQbOOADHwHBAzgSxKL7nGt+JAUmAd3216C26yiam0K90YjUIV6NwY3k1oHNKRGSef2sLIk8dPinaEoNSVFrW1BIc52ROvjQUrT+Ul1WbH6oBxU9OL9R41Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6N5i5qYQd7B6sMzkkvo075WEO5nqw0XDDkCCx36BPns=; b=kdN4LF0XAxtYbNQ3ariqJfzzlfRDMEP5pI7NFiBbO4n3E3UDeKxl25oi2bE/G3qZ7H+2kgtzXwsXN7B+/ybFq/9Xf8V2vVBDgI4fp5FGwd5X855tiveDJ/0MzQnuyPyPIk8w+rNGhlLP5LxeTsESewWxP+Cw4ooDnaqmwImTYpqptyB+9CoWEpmdFcPXq3DW1OjrrwHPH0/vIBHqjMZ8GtcjDCVTZEuypTyJBj5MAMCr855c9EmMDFvxVsIDza9N72WK5FiMc1tOsmwVjxYFhmuxQmVVL9opLoAp8Wn/8yDclcuTq5SLWOX7GwGwC02DQy8vfdV/E7vGidYtOukyUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6N5i5qYQd7B6sMzkkvo075WEO5nqw0XDDkCCx36BPns=; b=sCZnqzN360vVrb5AU/gidlGp6ccAipwLSlaiKPYQGozFrx1XeZTCaNvxaKZPskEHKwk2pfOHvFN6sdIX0vinZVZpP5G17cXSODvx6TC5o6DgGYfAtDuvmqcht6gA8VtkwXj8KZ+IBpJjH5Mn7NzOrbTJDraXT/w3PxVcfSWRDzc= Received: from DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:13f::31) by DM6PR11MB4027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:199::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.26; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:55:39 +0000 Received: from DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::98a:bb06:5551:e5a3]) by DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::98a:bb06:5551:e5a3%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2900.028; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:55:39 +0000 From: "Wu, Hao" To: "Xu, Yilun" CC: Tom Rix , "mdf@kernel.org" , "linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bhu@redhat.com" Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] fpga: dfl: pci: reduce the scope of variable 'ret' Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/2] fpga: dfl: pci: reduce the scope of variable 'ret' Thread-Index: AQHWE5193+0/nQdMD0KUurSvMI7dQ6h7YzcggACVlYCAAJaugIAAEAvggAAH1QCAACpPYA== Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:55:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1587006712-22696-1-git-send-email-yilun.xu@intel.com> <1587006712-22696-2-git-send-email-yilun.xu@intel.com> <9b1d85e0-4f44-179b-c847-af858fcc212a@redhat.com> <20200417015605.GA30618@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> <20200417032132.GA25293@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> In-Reply-To: <20200417032132.GA25293@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=hao.wu@intel.com; x-originating-ip: [192.102.204.38] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9bcebcfa-0248-4f3d-421c-08d7e293f548 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB4027: x-ld-processed: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d,ExtAddr x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:2733; x-forefront-prvs: 0376ECF4DD x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFTY:;SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(26005)(2906002)(6862004)(4326008)(86362001)(81156014)(186003)(8936002)(54906003)(55016002)(316002)(8676002)(9686003)(6636002)(5660300002)(4744005)(6506007)(71200400001)(478600001)(7696005)(52536014)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(76116006)(66946007)(33656002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Mv3cpmJyoisVAGQmzlaMykX8gmb59SsxMzKx7Y7y6wHnIhunw5PITAWyTC5+I7+LuAQgCvvKXpaiWLIV18xB5y+Sod5+RSoudWbc2q3i65BgFtX6BTKF1HvYAH728mdrhLMULXI89t+cXmtneYDfSYaKjdzmguAFDz21i9xY0F4uKMn/vDoY1ZOSZFukvKbhHwCAbROWA8g9jmfjM35WPvZmjebEJv7KbH5DrfdN69pWaZjkYKyMpU3072I8ZPzDLgyr8KFE/zr25IpDM95XdbOwOWFizSUg9+Fo1lUDWE5fjq/zexIKgndcp3kouqoFToJALeDECKI9kTXloLLBAQ3YTvrEONrmNchO/N5143oj+e3CHDdxHdj9dVYncn1b6+mnZp2jNZUzn+8hIlJkqAsadEri5RrHFn6HpMl60IFMn4V07GP6wPkrm8aG8gxT x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: FVo1gBb6xalGYHJuaWugLWHEiG5DEw3zp0ZYMuDp/FTmEmbMLf1q6kMBQkIrkhbqvcBqk1nwvtc/hTlGsrj6Drd/kWuEzrgphCVGOImsT9Ue6Fh9K8uSEPc+piZM4m551VB7IUAcMSBLDfA4hpf12w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9bcebcfa-0248-4f3d-421c-08d7e293f548 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Apr 2020 05:55:39.7948 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: GbaL3NdOjmnzCZwU6IlvpXL20tK7yRB28hCwIkuKCLWYH97a4Keaz6LFUhouZT2r+ZfOkGo/56rI4sLbTAWfvA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB4027 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fpga: dfl: pci: reduce the scope of variable= 'ret' > > > > > > Hi Rix: > > > > > > This patch is based on linux-next. There is an preceding patch > > > (3c2760b78f90 "fpga: dfl: pci: fix return value of cci_pci_sriov_conf= igure", > > > Also see Fixes:) in linux-next but not merged in 5.7-rc1 yet. > > > This patch is to fix the lkp warning brought by the previous one. > > > > Yilun > > > > Is it possible that commit id may be different for master then? >=20 > It is possible if the previous patch need a little change when merging > to master. >=20 > I'm not sure how to handle this then. But the previous patch is simple > and is unlikely to change. Maybe you can resend it once previous patch gets merged. Hao