linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@windriver.com>
To: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"viro@ftp.linux.org.uk" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventfd: convert global percpu eventfd_wake_count to ctx percpu eventfd_wake_count
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:58:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4202EF122EB1EE2384731FD2FF309@DM6PR11MB4202.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609081526.27104-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com>

Hello AI Viro,  Jens

There was no response to this patch for a long time,
can you help with the review?   I will thank you very much and look forward to your reply .

Thanks
Qiang

________________________________________
From: Zhang, Qiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 9 June 2021 16:15
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] eventfd: convert global percpu eventfd_wake_count to ctx percpu eventfd_wake_count

From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>

In RT system, the spinlock_irq be replaced by rt_mutex, when
call eventfd_signal(), if the current task is preempted after
increasing the current CPU eventfd_wake_count, when other task
run on this CPU and  call eventfd_signal(), find this CPU
eventfd_wake_count is not zero, will trigger warning and direct
return, miss wakeup.

RIP: 0010:eventfd_signal+0x85/0xa0
vhost_add_used_and_signal_n+0x41/0x50 [vhost]
handle_rx+0xb9/0x9e0 [vhost_net]
handle_rx_net+0x15/0x20 [vhost_net]
vhost_worker+0x95/0xe0 [vhost]
kthread+0x19c/0x1c0
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

In no-RT system, even if the eventfd_signal() call is nested, if
if it's different eventfd_ctx object, it is not happen deadlock.

Fixes: b5e683d5cab8 ("eventfd: track eventfd_signal() recursion depth")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
---
 v1->v2:
 Modify submission information.
 v2->v3:
 Fix compilation error in riscv32.

 fs/aio.c                |  2 +-
 fs/eventfd.c            | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
 include/linux/eventfd.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index 76ce0cc3ee4e..b45983d5d35a 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ static int aio_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
                list_del(&iocb->ki_list);
                iocb->ki_res.res = mangle_poll(mask);
                req->done = true;
-               if (iocb->ki_eventfd && eventfd_signal_count()) {
+               if (iocb->ki_eventfd && eventfd_signal_count(iocb->ki_eventfd)) {
                        iocb = NULL;
                        INIT_WORK(&req->work, aio_poll_put_work);
                        schedule_work(&req->work);
diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c
index e265b6dd4f34..b1df2c5720a7 100644
--- a/fs/eventfd.c
+++ b/fs/eventfd.c
@@ -25,26 +25,9 @@
 #include <linux/idr.h>
 #include <linux/uio.h>

-DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, eventfd_wake_count);

 static DEFINE_IDA(eventfd_ida);

-struct eventfd_ctx {
-       struct kref kref;
-       wait_queue_head_t wqh;
-       /*
-        * Every time that a write(2) is performed on an eventfd, the
-        * value of the __u64 being written is added to "count" and a
-        * wakeup is performed on "wqh". A read(2) will return the "count"
-        * value to userspace, and will reset "count" to zero. The kernel
-        * side eventfd_signal() also, adds to the "count" counter and
-        * issue a wakeup.
-        */
-       __u64 count;
-       unsigned int flags;
-       int id;
-};
-
 /**
  * eventfd_signal - Adds @n to the eventfd counter.
  * @ctx: [in] Pointer to the eventfd context.
@@ -71,17 +54,17 @@ __u64 eventfd_signal(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, __u64 n)
         * it returns true, the eventfd_signal() call should be deferred to a
         * safe context.
         */
-       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count)))
+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(*ctx->eventfd_wake_count)))
                return 0;

        spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags);
-       this_cpu_inc(eventfd_wake_count);
+       this_cpu_inc(*ctx->eventfd_wake_count);
        if (ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count < n)
                n = ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count;
        ctx->count += n;
        if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->wqh))
                wake_up_locked_poll(&ctx->wqh, EPOLLIN);
-       this_cpu_dec(eventfd_wake_count);
+       this_cpu_dec(*ctx->eventfd_wake_count);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags);

        return n;
@@ -92,6 +75,9 @@ static void eventfd_free_ctx(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx)
 {
        if (ctx->id >= 0)
                ida_simple_remove(&eventfd_ida, ctx->id);
+
+       if (ctx->eventfd_wake_count)
+               free_percpu(ctx->eventfd_wake_count);
        kfree(ctx);
 }

@@ -421,6 +407,10 @@ static int do_eventfd(unsigned int count, int flags)
        if (!ctx)
                return -ENOMEM;

+       ctx->eventfd_wake_count = alloc_percpu(int);
+       if (!ctx->eventfd_wake_count)
+               goto err;
+
        kref_init(&ctx->kref);
        init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wqh);
        ctx->count = count;
diff --git a/include/linux/eventfd.h b/include/linux/eventfd.h
index fa0a524baed0..6311b931ac6f 100644
--- a/include/linux/eventfd.h
+++ b/include/linux/eventfd.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/kref.h>

 /*
  * CAREFUL: Check include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h when defining
@@ -29,11 +30,27 @@
 #define EFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS (O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK)
 #define EFD_FLAGS_SET (EFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS | EFD_SEMAPHORE)

-struct eventfd_ctx;
 struct file;

 #ifdef CONFIG_EVENTFD

+struct eventfd_ctx {
+       struct kref kref;
+       wait_queue_head_t wqh;
+       /*
+       * Every time that a write(2) is performed on an eventfd, the
+       * value of the __u64 being written is added to "count" and a
+       * wakeup is performed on "wqh". A read(2) will return the "count"
+       * value to userspace, and will reset "count" to zero. The kernel
+       * side eventfd_signal() also, adds to the "count" counter and
+       * issue a wakeup.
+       */
+       __u64 count;
+       unsigned int flags;
+       int id;
+       int __percpu *eventfd_wake_count;
+};
+
 void eventfd_ctx_put(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx);
 struct file *eventfd_fget(int fd);
 struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd_ctx_fdget(int fd);
@@ -43,11 +60,10 @@ int eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, wait_queue_entry_t *w
                                  __u64 *cnt);
 void eventfd_ctx_do_read(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, __u64 *cnt);

-DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, eventfd_wake_count);

-static inline bool eventfd_signal_count(void)
+static inline bool eventfd_signal_count(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx)
 {
-       return this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count);
+       return this_cpu_read(*ctx->eventfd_wake_count);
 }

 #else /* CONFIG_EVENTFD */
@@ -78,7 +94,7 @@ static inline int eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx,
        return -ENOSYS;
 }

-static inline bool eventfd_signal_count(void)
+static inline bool eventfd_signal_count(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx)
 {
        return false;
 }
--
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09  8:15 [PATCH v3] eventfd: convert global percpu eventfd_wake_count to ctx percpu eventfd_wake_count qiang.zhang
2021-06-11  1:39 ` Zhang, Qiang
2021-06-15 14:58 ` Zhang, Qiang [this message]
2021-06-17  8:46   ` He Zhe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB4202EF122EB1EE2384731FD2FF309@DM6PR11MB4202.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=qiang.zhang@windriver.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).