Re: Signal 11

From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: michael@linuxmagic.com (Michael Peddemors)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Signal 11
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:09:29 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E146jNL-0000SN-00@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0012141807080M.19494@mistress> from "Michael Peddemors" at Dec 14, 2000 06:07:08 PM

> > o	We tell vendors to build RPMv3 , glibc 2.1.x
> Curious HOW do you tell vendors??

When they ask. More usefully Dan Quinlann and most vendors put together a
recommended set of things to build with and use. It warns about library
pitfalls, kernel changes and what packaging is supported. It is far from
perfect and nothing like the LSB goals but its a start and following it does
give you applications that with a bit of care run on everything.

> > o	Vendors not being stupid understand that they have a bigger market
> > 	share if they do that.
> Ummm.. I remember Oracle's first release... wasn't it JUST redhat??

I believe so, and Adabas was SuSE only, and I doubt either vendor wanted it
that way. Both actually ran fine on the other but were not supported.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/