From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:03:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:03:19 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:29244 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:03:09 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system In-Reply-To: <20010421114942.A26415@thyrsus.com> <200104212023.f3LKN7P188973@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Organization: private Linux site, southern Germany Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:33:17 +0200 From: Olaf Titz Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It is nice to have a single file for grep. With the proposed > changes one would sometimes need to grep every file. With the proposed changes it's nearly trivial to build the traditional MAINTAINERS file with a Makefile rule, so you've lost nothing. Plus you get the additional info (which the collecting script, two lines of sed in my estimate, would duly include[1]) which _file_ actually is maintained by whom. Which makes e.g. coordinating patches and bug reporting much easier. Olaf [1] Although Eric would probably rather want to use a database querying tool at this point :-)