From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 May 2001 18:12:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 May 2001 18:12:28 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:13829 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 May 2001 18:12:15 -0400 Subject: Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants To: jsimmons@transvirtual.com (James Simmons) Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 23:07:40 +0100 (BST) Cc: nico@cam.org (Nicolas Pitre), hpa@transmeta.com (H. Peter Anvin), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au (Neil Brown), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List) In-Reply-To: from "James Simmons" at May 15, 2001 02:28:11 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I couldn't agree with you more. It gives me headaches at work. One note, > their is a except to the eth0 thing. USB to USB networking. It uses usb0, > etc. I personally which they use eth0. > The packet framing is quite different so it doesnt really make sense. For wireless it does use ethernet packet format so it makes sense