From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264215AbRFHQoH>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:44:07 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264221AbRFHQn5>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:43:57 -0400
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:56592 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S264215AbRFHQnm>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:43:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table
To: hps@intermeta.de
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:42:11 +0100 (BST)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <9fq2ce$gkb$1@forge.intermeta.de> from "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" at Jun 08, 2001 08:29:02 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E158PKt-0002tq-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> >Linus opinion on this is irrelevant. Neither I nor the FSF nor many others
> >have released code under anything but the vanilla GPL. By merging such code
> >Linus lost his ability to vary the license.
> 
> Ok, this is a new opinion, because it voids the "using the published
> module ABI is unconditionally ok as stated again and again.

Sorry. I've been stating this since 1994 or so (shortly after Linus made his
comment at the end of the first linux kongress)