From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:37:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:37:42 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:45071 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:37:29 -0400 Subject: Re: Gigabit Intel NIC? - Intel Gigabit Ethernet Pro/1000T To: rhw@MemAlpha.CX (Riley Williams) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:29:26 +0100 (BST) Cc: ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu (Ion Badulescu), spstarr@sh0n.net (Shawn Starr), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) In-Reply-To: from "Riley Williams" at Jun 14, 2001 09:59:55 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > As I see it, if Shawn has permission to freely distribute the specs, > he can send a copy to Alan Cox for forwarding to the relevant driver > developers. However, if he has to sign an NDA to get them, they're > useless... > > Alan: Am I right in assuming this? It depends on the NDA. Lots of vendors NDA their docs because they give enough info to cloen the hardware, or explain how to fab the chip, or include personal details of employees .. and a million other reasons. Many sensible, many quite daft. But in my experience you have a better chance of getting a straight answer out of a politician than intels networking folks. Maybe they have reformed Alan