linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: dhowells@redhat.com (David Howells)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
	dhowells@redhat.com (David Howells),
	jes@sunsite.dk (Jes Sorensen),
	dwmw2@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	arjanv@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:53:14 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E15HOjy-0007aR-00@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3911.994146916@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> from "David Howells" at Jul 03, 2001 08:55:16 AM

> For example, one board I've got doesn't allow you to do a straight
> memory-mapped I/O access to your PCI device directly, but have to reposition a
> window in the CPU's memory space over part of the PCI memory space first, and
> then hold a spinlock whilst you do it.

What does this prove. PA-RISC has this problem in reverse for I/O cycle access
to PCI slots on hppa1.1 at least. Cookies work _fine_

And by the time you are taking a spinlock who cares about the add, you can do
that while the bus transactions for the atomic op are completing

On the other hand each call, each push of resource * pointers costs real clocks
on x86


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-07-03 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-28 13:13 [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions David Howells
2001-06-28 13:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-28 13:55   ` David Woodhouse
2001-06-28 16:02     ` Jes Sorensen
2001-06-29  8:31       ` David Howells
2001-06-29 21:02         ` Jes Sorensen
2001-07-02 14:22         ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 15:57           ` David Howells
2001-07-02 16:17             ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 16:20               ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 16:41                 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 16:56                   ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 18:22                     ` Russell King
2001-07-02 18:26                       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-02 20:10                         ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 22:08                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-02 22:15                             ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 23:54                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03 12:02                                 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-03 14:38                                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03  2:06                           ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  8:38                             ` David Howells
2001-07-07 11:27                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-07-03  8:15                         ` David Howells
2001-07-03  8:22                           ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  8:31                             ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  9:00                               ` David Howells
2001-07-03  9:29                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-02 22:10                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03  8:04                     ` David Howells
2001-07-03  7:55                 ` David Howells
2001-07-03  8:00                   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  8:07                     ` David Howells
2001-07-03 11:53                   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2001-07-07 11:26                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
     [not found] <20010702191129.A29246@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-07-03  8:12 ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E15HOjy-0007aR-00@the-village.bc.nu \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@redhat.com \
    --cc=jes@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).