From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:40:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:40:11 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:48914 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:40:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFT] #2 Support for ~2144 SCSI discs To: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca (Richard Gooch) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 16:36:42 +0100 (BST) Cc: adilger@turbolinux.com (Andreas Dilger), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Richard Gooch" at Aug 02, 2001 08:37:20 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So, yes, you can already patch other subsystems to dynamically assign > major numbers in 2.4.7. I'd like to see people do that. My patch for > sd.c can also serve as a demonstration on how to use the new API. Its a bit of an ugly hack but I guess its the best anyone can put together for a 2.4 kernel tree. Going to a 32bit dev_t is going to make life so much simpler do all of this without ugly hacks Alan