From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S271744AbRHQWIE>; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:08:04 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S271739AbRHQWHz>; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:07:55 -0400
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:49426 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S271733AbRHQWHT>; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:07:19 -0400
Subject: Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH]
To: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 23:09:15 +0100 (BST)
Cc: riel@conectiva.com.br, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tpepper@vato.org,
        f5ibh@db0bm.ampr.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "David S. Miller" at Aug 17, 2001 02:59:27 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15Xrnn-0008Bl-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> If Linus scribbled all over the network code I would
> have to accept it if it were a kernel wide cleanup he
> absolutely wanted.

That doesn't make it right, it merely makes the perpetrator wrong.