From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:28:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:28:21 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:59922 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:28:12 -0400 Subject: Re: Qlogic/FC firmware To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:30:46 +0100 (BST) Cc: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, jes@sunsite.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Rik van Riel" at Aug 21, 2001 11:42:11 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I guess using an initrd on these 0.3% of machines shouldn't > be too big a problem compared to violating the GPL and adding > to kernel bloat for everybody else. The license thing is a side issue. We have a sane relationship with Qlogic so that can easily be dealt with. For 2.5 it definitely wants to be in initrd-tng however