From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:46:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:46:15 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:14861 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:46:02 -0400 Subject: Re: Qlogic/FC firmware To: jfbeam@bluetopia.net (Ricky Beam) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:49:09 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Ricky Beam" at Aug 22, 2001 09:29:38 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Amazing *and* unnecessarily complex. What a bargin! And it's still going > to consume that precious 128K even when loaded from usersapce as the driver > will still need to keep it. And aren't you one of the Preists of Text in No. We can jettison it and you know that in fact you commented on using __initdata in the non modular case, so stop trolling and if you are going to be a pain, at least be consistant in your arguments. > /proc -- those of the belief in managing everything with 'cat' and 'vi'. No. That would be Al Viro. > >sloppy "who cares about 128K" thinking that leads to several megs > >disappearing and your OS turning into sludge. > > Way too damn late make that argument. That snowball has been gaining mass > and speed for years now. I would not recommend standing in front of it. If I was working on Irix maybe, but I'm not. I've got another .5Mb on my 256Mb box I want back in 2.5 as well 8) > "little problem". I'm guessing this is a problem for Alphas as well. Altho' Alpha's have x86 emulation in the boot loaders. Thats a not-nice solution to most of the PC worlds evils but works out. > >Take that one up with Linus. I didn't merge it originally > > No, you take it up with Linus (and the Qlogic maintainer) as you are the nut > removing it ... and introducing a great big question mark around the stability > of the Qlogic FC driver. See previous four conversations on this. Licensing matters. Case closed Alan