From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:16:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:16:18 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:40207 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:16:04 -0400 Subject: Re: yenta_socket hangs sager laptop in kernel 2.4.6-> PNPBIOS life saver To: Gunther.Mayer@t-online.de (Gunther Mayer) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:18:20 +0100 (BST) Cc: kraxel@bytesex.org (Gerd Knorr), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Alexey Kuznetsov), alan@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Gunther Mayer" at Aug 22, 2001 07:35:23 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Try -ac Kernels with integrated PNPBIOS and "lspnp -v", > then you will see your "motherboard resources". No magic. Except on the intel boards where your machine crashes, the vaio's where some queries corrupt memory, the boxes where an interrupt during a pnpbios call crashes the box, the machines where pnpbios called from both cpus at the same time is a crash case, the wonderful weird tiny races on some boxes that use smm traps and fail if random undefined things occur between the two out instructions... > Alan, 2.4 would largely benefit from PNPBIOS, do you plan > to submit this to LT (probably with the proposed life saver fix) ? Experience is that PnpBIOS services are so astoundingly buggy in many bioses that they are probably not worth the risk. Ie more boxes break by calling pnpbios than by assuming the vendor used a sane resource layout. Before PnPBIOS can go mainstream we'd have to generate a detailed list of buggy bios signatures Alan