From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:17:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:17:20 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:19470 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:17:10 -0400 Subject: Re: ioctl conflicts To: manik@cisco.com (Manik Raina) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:20:45 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manik@cisco.com In-Reply-To: <3B8DEF9D.26F7544D@cisco.com> from "Manik Raina" at Aug 30, 2001 01:17:41 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I was grep-ing on a 2.4 source tree when i found the > following : > > ./include/linux/videodev.h:#define VIDIOCGCAP > _IOR('v',1,struct video_capability) > ./include/linux/ext2_fs.h:#define EXT2_IOC_GETVERSION _IOR('v',1, > long) Thats fine. ext2 ioctls and video ioctls go to different places