From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 19:12:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 19:12:27 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:55054 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 19:12:10 -0400 Subject: Re: Athlon: Try this (was: Re: Athlon bug stomping #2) To: VDA@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 00:16:05 +0100 (BST) Cc: VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz (Petr Vandrovec), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1292125035.20010914214303@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> from "VDA" at Sep 14, 2001 09:43:03 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > +static void __init pci_fixup_athlon_bug(struct pci_dev *d) > +{ > + u8 v; > + pci_read_config_byte(d, 0x55, &v); > + if(v & 0x80) { > + printk(KERN_NOTICE "Stomping on Athlon bug.\n"); > + v &= 0x7f; /* clear bit 55.7 */ > + pci_write_config_byte(d, 0x55, v); > + } > +} > > Well, these are cosmetic changes anyway... > What is more important now: > 1) Do we have people who still see Athlon bug with the patch? > 2) Do Alan read these messages? ;-) Im watching the discussion with interest. If it proves to be the magic bullet I will ask VIA for guidance on the issue