From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:09:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:09:33 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:48402 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:09:29 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 04:14:01 +0100 (BST) Cc: bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Kernel Mailing List) In-Reply-To: from "Linus Torvalds" at Sep 17, 2001 07:27:31 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The bug fixes in -ac that aren't merged into -linus are that way BECAUSE > NOBODY HAS SENT ME MERGES. Actually some of them I've sent you many times. The tlb fix I have on my list of "dont bother" for example - which means I got bored of sending it. > Alan works on it quite intensively, but the fact is, that for the -ac > merge, Alan seems to be able to merge it slower than -ac grows. Which is > why I actually started asking people to merge their parts from -ac into > -linus to help Alan. That's how the other merge in -pre11 happened. I've been trying to ensure I feed stuff in testable chunks. For example I dont want vfs and scsi changes both in a Linus merge because someone is bound to go "hey I got corruption" and then with both in one merge we are screwed Alan