From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 04:15:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 04:14:46 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:41995 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 04:14:14 -0500 Subject: Re: Who sees "IRQ routing conflict" in dmesg? To: miles@megapathdsl.net (Miles Lane) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:21:46 +0000 (GMT) Cc: miles@megapathdsl.net (Miles Lane), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (LKML), manfred@colorfullife.com (Manfred Spraul) In-Reply-To: <1005442525.14433.1.camel@stomata.megapathdsl.net> from "Miles Lane" at Nov 10, 2001 05:35:25 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfdad1, last bus=1 > PCI: Using configuration type 1 > PCI: Probing PCI hardware > PCI: Error 89 when fetching IRQ routing table. > > As you can see below, I wasn't encountering this problem with > 2.4.14. PCI bios buffer too small. The BIOS seems to want to give you back a config file over 4K long. That seems odd to say the least