From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 16:54:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 16:53:53 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:3848 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 16:53:43 -0500 Subject: Re: To: garzik@havoc.gtf.org (Legacy Fishtank) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:03:59 +0000 (GMT) Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com (Manfred Spraul), klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011225141441.A14941@havoc.gtf.org> from "Legacy Fishtank" at Dec 25, 2001 02:14:41 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's required by newer RedHat and MDK initscripts, perhaps others. > ip, iproute and similar utilities use it, and so since it's commonly Basically because Dave refused to recognize lots of embedded setups don't need the netlink crap and couldn't just accept defaulting it to Y we all get lumbered with it > required DaveM made it unconditional... I think the checkin comment was > something along the lines of "make it unconditional unless Alan > complains about kernel bloat" :) And I did complain. "Red Hat needs XYZ so we make it mandatory" is not an appropriate approach to a problem. Alan