From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>, "Timothy D. Witham" <wookie@osdl.org>
Cc: Luigi Genoni <kernel@Expansa.sns.it>,
Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stp@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:50:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16OoyR-0001DA-00@starship.berlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111041955290.30596-100000@Expansa.sns.it> <1004978377.1226.22.camel@wookie-laptop.pdx.osdl.net> <3BEF6B1B.1E077ED9@kegel.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BEF6B1B.1E077ED9@kegel.com>
On November 12, 2001 07:24 am, Dan Kegel wrote:
> At some point it might be nice to also use the STP to help
> speed gcc 3 development, too. (I personally am really
> looking forward to the day when I can use the same compiler
> for both c++ and kernel.)
You already can, at least I can because gcc3 builds recent kernels just fine.
IOW, it works for me. Conservatively, it's good to keep the old compiler
around (choose your poison) for those few apps that don't build with gcc, but
I feel quite comfortable at the moment having gcc3 as my default.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-14 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111040832060.364-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
2001-11-04 17:58 ` Regression testing of 2.4.x before release? Dan Kegel
2001-11-04 19:09 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-11-05 1:51 ` Dan Kegel
2001-11-05 16:39 ` Timothy D. Witham
2001-11-12 6:24 ` Dan Kegel
2002-01-10 23:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-12 0:04 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2002-01-12 0:29 ` eddantes
2002-01-12 0:34 ` [OT] " Kurt Garloff
2002-01-10 23:50 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-11-12 19:07 ` Timothy D. Witham
2001-11-13 4:53 ` Dan Kegel
2001-11-13 22:00 ` STP for automated GCC testing (was Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x beforerelease?) Bryce Harrington
2001-11-04 7:03 Regression testing of 2.4.x before release? Dan Kegel
2001-11-04 7:15 ` Ted Deppner
2001-11-04 12:04 ` Tahar
2001-11-04 17:27 ` Ted Deppner
2001-11-04 18:41 ` Luigi Genoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E16OoyR-0001DA-00@starship.berlin \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=kernel@Expansa.sns.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
--cc=stp@osdl.org \
--cc=wookie@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).