From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:14:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:13:58 -0500 Received: from [66.89.142.2] ([66.89.142.2]:56886 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:13:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Dan Kegel , "Timothy D. Witham" Subject: Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release? Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:50:42 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Luigi Genoni , Mike Galbraith , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stp@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <1004978377.1226.22.camel@wookie-laptop.pdx.osdl.net> <3BEF6B1B.1E077ED9@kegel.com> In-Reply-To: <3BEF6B1B.1E077ED9@kegel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On November 12, 2001 07:24 am, Dan Kegel wrote: > At some point it might be nice to also use the STP to help > speed gcc 3 development, too. (I personally am really > looking forward to the day when I can use the same compiler > for both c++ and kernel.) You already can, at least I can because gcc3 builds recent kernels just fine. IOW, it works for me. Conservatively, it's good to keep the old compiler around (choose your poison) for those few apps that don't build with gcc, but I feel quite comfortable at the moment having gcc3 as my default. -- Daniel