From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 18:34:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 18:34:17 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:25606 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 18:34:17 -0400 Subject: Re: IO stats in /proc/partitions To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 23:53:06 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br In-Reply-To: from "Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl" at May 04, 2002 09:59:26 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Earlier I noticed that RedHat did put some statistics in > /proc/partitions. That was bad, but I assumed that it was > their laziness, being too busy to do a proper job. It was put there in the 2.2 era after discussion with various folks. Its been in most vendor kernels for about four years. > On the other hand, disk statistics should not be in > /proc/partitions. They should be in /proc/diskstatistics. > I see a heading today "rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge" > "wsect wuse running use aveq". No doubt next year we'll > want different statistics. So /proc/diskstatistics should > start with a header line including a version field. The stats have been unchanged for years too. As to version lines why ? This is lets mke /proc XML hell again > Please keep these disk statistics apart from /proc/partitions. It has to contain each partiiton anyway.