From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 16:43:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 16:43:07 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:44807 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 16:43:06 -0400 Subject: Re: InfiniBand BOF @ LSM - topics of interest To: woody@co.intel.com (Woodruff, Robert J) Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 22:01:05 +0100 (BST) Cc: shemminger@osdl.org ('Stephen Hemminger'), zaitcev@redhat.com (Pete Zaitcev), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Woodruff, Robert J" at May 15, 2002 01:37:02 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's clear from this email thread that there is a lot of > confusion about the intended use of InfiniBand and it's > benefits. I'll take that as a need to prepare some material > for the Linux SymposiuM BOF that shows some of > the benefits of InfiniBand as demonstrated on the early > InfiniBand hardware. That would I think be good. Especially if we can get lots of pure networking and pure I/O driver people at the BOF