From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 20:14:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 20:14:20 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:27658 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 20:14:19 -0400 Subject: Re: InfiniBand BOF @ LSM - topics of interest To: woody@co.intel.com (Woodruff, Robert J) Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 01:32:09 +0100 (BST) Cc: russ@elegant-software.com ('Russell Leighton'), Tony.P.Lee@nokia.com, wookie@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, lmb@suse.de, woody@co.intel.com (Woodruff Robert J), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com In-Reply-To: from "Woodruff, Robert J" at May 15, 2002 04:58:24 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > so someone could invent a new address family for sockets, > say AF_INFINIBANDO, that is much more light weight than the existing TCP/IP > stack. > Thus with a small change to the application, a good performance increase can > be attained. Shouldn't be too hard. It looks like its basically AF_PACKET combined with the infiniband notions of security.