From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Paolo Ciarrocchi <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LMbench2.0 results
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:55:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17oRol-0006pi-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <312431072.1031563589@[10.10.2.3]>
On Monday 09 September 2002 18:26, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > An idea that's looking more and more attractive as time goes by is to
> > have a global config option that specifies that we want to choose the
> > simple way of doing things wherever possible, over the enterprise way.
> > We want this especially for embedded. On low end processors, it's even
> > possible that the small way will be faster in some cases than the
> > enterprise way, due to cache effects.
>
> Can't we just use the existing config options instead? CONFIG_SMP is
> a good start ;-) How many embedded systems with SMP do you have?
You need to look at it from the other direction: how do the needs of a
uniprocessor Clawhammer box differ from a Linksys adsl router?
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-09 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-07 12:18 LMbench2.0 results Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-07 12:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-07 18:53 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-07 21:44 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-13 22:46 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-07 14:33 ` James Morris
2002-09-09 22:22 ` Cliff White
2002-09-07 16:20 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-07 20:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-07 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-07 23:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-07 23:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-08 17:07 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-08 18:11 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-08 18:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-08 20:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-09-08 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 21:13 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-09 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 22:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-08 7:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-08 7:37 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-08 8:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-08 8:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-08 9:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-08 20:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 13:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 16:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 16:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-09 16:55 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-09-09 17:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-09 21:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-09 16:52 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-07 12:40 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-07 14:09 Shane Shrybman
2002-09-07 18:04 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-13 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-07 18:09 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-08 7:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-14 18:26 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-15 18:08 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-22 12:42 Paolo Ciarrocchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17oRol-0006pi-00@starship \
--to=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).