From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:16:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:16:04 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-058.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.58]:26016 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:16:03 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.5.34-mm2 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 06:23:51 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" References: <3D803434.F2A58357@digeo.com> <3D8408A9.7B34483D@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <3D8408A9.7B34483D@digeo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 15 September 2002 06:12, Andrew Morton wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > I heard you > > mention, on the one hand, huge speedups on some load (dbench I think) > > but your in-patch comments mention slowdown by 1.7X on kernel > > compile. > > You misread. Relative times for running `make -j6 bzImage' with mem=512m: > > Unloaded system: 1.0 > 2.5.34-mm4, while running 4 x `dbench 100' 1.7 > Any other kernel while running 4 x `dbench 100' basically infinity Oh good :-) We can make the rescanning go away in time, with more lru lists, but that sure looks like the low hanging fruit. -- Daniel