From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:00:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:00:44 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-078.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.78]:43905 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:00:44 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: 2.5.34-mm2 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 19:08:24 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" References: <3D841C8A.682E6A5C@digeo.com> <3D84BFC8.2D8A7592@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <3D84BFC8.2D8A7592@digeo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 15 September 2002 19:13, Andrew Morton wrote: > Yes, I'm not particularly fussed about (moderate) excess CPU use in these > situations, and nor about page replacement accuracy, really - pages > are being slushed through the system so fast that correct aging of the > ones on the inactive list probably just doesn't count. What you really mean is, it hasn't gotten to the top of the list of things that suck. When we do get around to fashioning a really effective page ager (LRU-er, more likely) the further improvement will be obvious, especially under heavy streaming IO load, which is getting more important all the time. -- Daniel