From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:42:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:42:01 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-022-250.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.22.250]:28598 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:42:00 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: davidm@hpl.hp.com, David Mosberger , Dave Olien Subject: Re: DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:44:08 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: axboe@suse.de, _deepfire@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020923120400.A15452@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> <15759.26918.381273.951266@napali.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <15759.26918.381273.951266@napali.hpl.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 23 September 2002 21:19, David Mosberger wrote: > Hi Dave, > > >>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:04:00 -0700, Dave Olien said: > > Dave> #ifdef __ia64__ > Dave> - writeq(Virtual_to_Bus64(CommandMailbox), > Dave> + writeq(CommandMailboxDMA, > Dave> ControllerBaseAddress + DAC960_LP_CommandMailboxBusAddressOffset); > Dave> #else > Dave> - writel(Virtual_to_Bus32(CommandMailbox), > Dave> + writel(CommandMailboxDMA, > Dave> ControllerBaseAddress + DAC960_LP_CommandMailboxBusAddressOffset); > Dave> #endif > > This looks like a porting-nightmare in the making. There's got to be a > better way to determine whether you need a writeq() vs. a writel(). Even if an #ifdef is necessary here (and we are in trouble if it is) it should not trigger on __ia64__, it should trigger on the size of (long). -- Daniel