archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <>
To: Andrew Morton <>,
	Lorenzo Allegrucci <>
Cc: Linux Kernel <>
Subject: Re: qsbench, interesting results
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:05:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17wNeG-0005th-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Monday 30 September 2002 07:57, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'll take a look at some preferential throttling later on.  But
> I must say that I'm not hugely worried about performance regression
> under wild swapstorms.  The correct fix is to go buy some more
> RAM, and the kernel should not be trying to cater for underprovisioned
> machines if that affects the usual case.

The operative phrase here is "if that affects the usual case".  Actually,
the quicksort bench is not that bad a model of a usual case, i.e., a
working set 50% bigger than RAM.  The page replacement algorithm ought to
do something sane with it, and swap performance ought to be decent in
general, since desktop users typically have less than 1/2 GB.  With media
apps, bloated desktops and all, it doesn't go as far as it used to.

My impression is that page replacement just hasn't gotten a lot of
attention recently, and there is nothing wrong with that.  It's tuning,
not a feature.

The sort failure is something to worry about though - that's clearly a


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-01 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-29 14:15 Lorenzo Allegrucci
2002-09-29 16:26 ` bert hubert
2002-09-29 19:56   ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2002-09-29 20:00     ` bert hubert
2002-09-29 21:05       ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2002-09-30  5:57 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-01 14:05   ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-10-01 16:52     ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 17:03       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 17:13         ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 17:20           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 17:29             ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 17:38               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 18:18         ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2002-10-01 17:15       ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-01 18:04     ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-01 18:20       ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 18:35       ` Daniel Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E17wNeG-0005th-00@starship \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: qsbench, interesting results' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).