From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261622AbTILBUm (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:20:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261630AbTILBUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:20:41 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:63152 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261622AbTILBUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:20:41 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reiser3/4 & Ext2/3 was: First impressions of reiserfs4 In-Reply-To: <20030912005007.B11566@bitwizard.nl> X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.19-20030610 ("Darts") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-xfs (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 03:20:37 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20030912005007.B11566@bitwizard.nl> you wrote: > at all. But no backup superblock, is just plain wrong. this totally depends on the capabilities of the fsck and in-kerlen journal replay code, if they can reconstruct the data in there. Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/