From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932610AbWAKIj5@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932610AbWAKIj5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:39:57 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932612AbWAKIj5
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:39:57 -0500
Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:39144 "EHLO mail.inka.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932610AbWAKIj4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:39:56 -0500
From: be-news06@lina.inka.de (Bernd Eckenfels)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2G memory split
Organization: Private Site running Debian GNU/Linux
In-Reply-To: <20060110202819.GJ3389@suse.de>
X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel
User-Agent: tin/1.7.8-20050315 ("Scalpay") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.13.4 (i686))
Message-Id: <E1EwbWM-00029C-00@calista.inka.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:39:54 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> To me the former is clearer, it tells you that you have one full gig of
> low memory. But maybe that's just me.

It still does not describe what the consequences, especiall the difference
to the non-optimized case is. When do you want to use it, and when not.

Gruss
Bernd