From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752127AbZAZLfg (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:35:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751325AbZAZLf1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:35:27 -0500 Received: from fxip-0047f.externet.hu ([88.209.222.127]:36088 "EHLO pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbZAZLf1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:35:27 -0500 To: rjw@sisk.pl CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu In-reply-to: (rjw@sisk.pl) Subject: Re: [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host References: Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:35:24 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). Yes, still unfixed. There was some private discussion with the scheduler guys and now I suspect this is not a scheduler regression but a more longstanding UML bug that was made visible by some scheduler changes. Thanks, Miklos > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208 > Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host > Submitter : Miklos Szeredi > Date : 2008-12-12 9:35 (39 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4 > > >